<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily 365: Saguaro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amylampdesign.com/2010/02/daily-365-saguaro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amylampdesign.com/2010/02/daily-365-saguaro/</link>
	<description>graphic design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.amylampdesign.com/2010/02/daily-365-saguaro/comment-page-1/#comment-4047</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 05:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amylampdesign.com/?p=561#comment-4047</guid>
		<description>Very cool idea, especially the top right hand part of the lichen mountain.
But the narrow depth of field, throwing the lower left side of the photo out of focus, kind of messes up the illusion.
Solution: for a closeup like this, be sure to use a tripod and do a longer exposure. That should allow you to shoot with a very small aperture, like f16 or f22 -- which will give you much greater depth of field in your photo. That&#039;s not always possible in an extreme close-up, but it&#039;s worth experimenting with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool idea, especially the top right hand part of the lichen mountain.<br />
But the narrow depth of field, throwing the lower left side of the photo out of focus, kind of messes up the illusion.<br />
Solution: for a closeup like this, be sure to use a tripod and do a longer exposure. That should allow you to shoot with a very small aperture, like f16 or f22 &#8212; which will give you much greater depth of field in your photo. That&#8217;s not always possible in an extreme close-up, but it&#8217;s worth experimenting with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

